High demand and downloads doesn’t always translate or mean higher prices when selling your video or photos online. This isn’t like the stock market where the hot IPO creates major demand and then price soars on the first day of trading. So what happened to the basic laws of supply and demand that we all slept through during Economics 101 and how it is used to determine price? Obviously a bidding war over the latest Britney Spear’s outrageous photo or a video of the 9/11 attacks can increase the value based on the exclusivity or the sheer uniqueness of a shot. But does a high number of downloads or purchased licenses mean a higher value? Not always but it can change from case to case from what we have researched here at Cutcaster.

We found that, when looking at how to price your media, the value can decrease the more times people license or buy your content for use in advertising, film-making, publishing or graphic design. That makes sense. For example, an advertiser can’t have the same images or photos that a competitor has used to promote a similar product. Exclusivity. Imagine if you saw a similar images in an advertisement for Crest toothpaste which was the same as one you saw for Colgate. For this industry and market, once used content has become somewhat worthless to others based on exclusivity. However, a documentary film maker can re-use images or footage that the advertiser used and the content shouldn’t lose its value from one work to another. The first example with the advertiser is an interesting occurrence and one that goes against basic laws of supply and demand. So how do you determine and keep the value of your content, whether its footage, photos or any other digital content or maximize the life and value of the content?

Some helpful tricks:

1. Update your work- You can always go back and tweak your content. Re-work an old project.

2. Find new clients and offer it in new markets. The Internet has made it easier than ever to find new clients and new markets where your content is fresh and still has a high value. Try locating advertisers in Japan, China or India if you have relevant content

3. Find new uses in different fields. If your content has been used in an advertisement, maybe it can be used in a film or a corporate project for example.

4. Cut up or increase the amount of content you offer. For example, if you have a clip that is 2 minutes try breaking it up and selling off pieces of it to interested parties or vice a versa.

5. Use Cutcaster’s dynamic algorithm (subliminal marketing ;-) )

6. Shoot different variations of the similar selling content. If shots of cars winding around cliffs by the ocean are selling, use different types of cars, different types of lighting, different seasons, different angles etc.

7. Bundle the content in volumes that you have prepared or in “lightboxes” you can sell. Lightboxes are designed to help you get organized and are used to batch images or footage that you like or are similar together.

There are a few other tricks that we have analyzed for our Cutcaster algorithm that will help with pricing and take out a lot of the guessing game and work for those who would rather shoot then worry about how to offer their content.

What are some other good factors to look which can adversely affect the price of a piece of content or increase it?

Share
 

Wake up from your Cutcaster food coma. Looks like Getty has finally launched their Consumer website. They are calling it Jam’d or JAMD, I couldn’t tell just yet but not sure what that refers to.

The headline says, “Million of images, tons to talk about.” Obviously there are not a lot of things to talk about as they build up membership. We can all relate with that. Beside the normal bugs that come up with a new website (the first time page doesn’t upload and images didn’t upload in Internet Explorer) I found it a bit of a snoozer and very hard to navigate. Definitely didn’t have anything innovative on it. Was this the big news we were all waiting for? What did you think?

Share
 

If you have footage, photos, animations or motion graphics similar to the examples below and you own the rights to them, upload the content and help satisfy some of the needs we have come across when reaching out to potential buyers. These topics and niches have been requested by our growing list of buyers.

Footage and photos that we want (in alphabetical order):

Animations: 3D background animations, 3D/2D motion graphics, background for text in DVD projects and menu systems, web graphics, promotional images and characters, etc.

Action Shots: People eating, working, playing, driving; things in motion or transit

Commercials: Spec commercials, pre and post roll ads, 15-30 seconds in length. All subject matter is welcome and will be listed under short film.

Concept Stock: Deep Hidden Meanings (DHM), images that represent emotions

Corporate Footage: Office shots, conference room shots, presentation shots, people in their work environment, etc.

Documentary/Short Films: All issues and topics

Geographic: Video and images of people and places around the world past, present and future; reels of specific locations, domestic and international

Healthcare: Administrative footage, imagery of healthcare providers and staff attending to administrative tasks in hospital/office settings, images of prescriptions such as pills, medicine, etc.

Historical/Archival: Images and video that capture a moment in history, archive footage

Journalism: News worthy images or video content of relevant issues around the world; local, national and international

Photography: Portraits, still-life, abstract, aerial shots, architecture, motion photography, photo journalism, satellite photography, infrared, cityscapes, travel photography

Rare Artifacts: Footage in King Tuts tomb, an archaeological digs, findings, etc. The more rare, the more downloads.

Religious/Spiritual: Footage of rituals, festivals, representative imagery, sermons, etc.

Specialty/Niche Footage: For example, firefighting, extreme fighting, extreme weather reels, hard to find captivating footage

Sports: skateboarding, Squash, mountain biking, ping pong, beer pong, soccer, karate, billiards, Championship ceremonies and shots (i.e. the winning shot), etc. Remember you need your releases.

We are building a high definition library and seeking HD or HDV footage or photos for almost any subject. If you have this content our buyers are interested. Please upload it to the marketplace for review.

Do you need a particular image or video? Post your requirements in the Project Request Forum! Cutcaster offers royalty free images, stock photos, stock footage and stock photography for advertising, publishing or web design.

Share
 

Stock footage and photography is a set of ready video and images where you purchase the rights to use the image rather than assigning your own cameramen or photographers to shoot.

The main benefits of digital stock footage and photography include getting to see the final piece of content before you license the rights to use them and they can be licensed immediately.

Additionally, the cost for stock footage and photography, specifically Royalty Free content are much lower compared to assignment or commissioned work. This saves you the cost of hiring the model(s), photographer, location, props, art direction and editing costs.

Share
 

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I_tWfKM8ik&rel=1]

Because every strike needs a good rap.

Enjoy this for a Friday break and have a great Holiday weekend with your families and friends.

Written and Performed by : Writer Boi

Directed and edited by : David Schlussel

Shot by : Robert W. Swanson

Share
 


One of the few photographs to show the Earth in its entirety, The Blue Marble was shot on December 7, 1972 from Apollo 17 as it left orbit on the way to the moon. Officially, the photograph is credited to the entire crew, but it was mostly likely to have been taken by Jack Schmitt using a 70mm Hasselblad. It was the last time that humans have been high enough to shoot the entire Earth in one frame and is one of the most widely distributed images in the world.
Image courtesy of Earth Sciences and Image Analysis Laboratory, NASA Johnson Space Center

Photopreneur has a great write up on some public domain images that are simple outstanding. Many times when you see these images it means that someone has paid to enable you to see that image as photopreneur points out, whether it is the publisher, the ad company or the buyer.

Photopreneur points out that, “when it comes to photography, some of the best things really are free. That’s because copyright only lasts as long as the owner’s lifetime plus around seventy years so many images have fallen into the public domain, and also because one of the biggest sources of images is the US government. And because the government serves the citizens, the citizens own the images.”


This photograph of a jellyfish was shot by Henry Kaiser of the National Science Foundation under the Ross Sea ice in October 2005. It’s a pretty amazing example of a free image.
Photography: Henry Kaiser


The Fairy of Eagle Nebula
Credit: The Hubble Heritage Team, (STScI/AURA), ESA, NASA

Explanation: The dust sculptures of the Eagle Nebula are evaporating. As powerful starlight whittles away these cool cosmic mountains, the statuesque pillars that remain might be imagined as mythical beasts. Pictured above is one of several striking dust pillars of the Eagle Nebula that might be described as a gigantic alien fairy. This fairy, however, is ten light years tall and spews radiation much hotter than common fire. The greater Eagle Nebula, M16, is actually a giant evaporating shell of gas and dust inside of which is a growing cavity filled with a spectacular stellar nursery currently forming an open cluster of stars. The above image in scientifically re-assigned colors was released as part of the fifteenth anniversary celebration of the launch of the Hubble Space Telescope.

Share
 

Fotolia has debuted what it’s calling the “Infinite Collection.” This is a set of 15,000 agency-distributed photographs that would normally be found on expensive stock photography sites but are now being sold for as little as $20 on Fotolia. http://www.blogger.com/img/gl.link.gif

Will this force higher end stock photography sites to lower their prices? Is this a form of price discrimination because Fotolia won’t list the collections they are getting the photos from? Are the photographers whose photos are being sold aware that they are being sold this way by ?

I’ll be watching this development closely to see how well they can incorporate this offering into their business model and client base.

Share
 

Q&A with Lane Hartwell in “Going to the mat for photo copyrights“:

Shankland: What do you think of watermarking to address the issue?

Hartwell: A great idea. Sites like Flickr need to employ an automatic watermarking system. The site I am moving my work to, Photoshelter, allows me to set that all up in advance and I never have to deal with it again. It´s applied to every photo.

Shankland: How much did you bill the Richter Scales?

Hartwell: They haven´t received the invoice yet. I can tell you that I used Fotoquote and calculated the invoice based on usage, the market where the photograph is to be used and various other factors, which are the typical parameters photographers use when pricing an image.

Share
 

Just received this letter from Sharmeen Obaid, who has been doing some unbelievable work around the world and is married to an Exeter and UPenn guy. Two schools close to my heart ;-)

Dear Friends

Many of you have expressed interest in the upcoming elections in
Pakistan….As i mentioned earlier i will be writing for PBS Frontline World
throughout the month…

My next Dispatch is up:
http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/blog/2007/12/pakistan_the_ot.html

Also if you haven’t voted for the International Museum of Women’s
Imagining Ourselves Project, please do so when you have a minute- There are
some fantastic stories out there:

http://imaginingourselves.imow.org/pb/Conversation.aspx?id=94&lang=1

All my best,
Sharmeen

Share
 

Due to some issues we are having with cropping photographs instead of re-sizing them during the thumbnail generation in our backend, we have instituted some content requirements. In the meantime we are working on coming up with a solution that will re-size and not crop images when they are displayed on the site.

The minimum file size should be 1600 x 1200 pixels if possible. Make sure you upload the largest file size that you have. For example, 300 dpi 5″ x 7″ is ideal. A lot of the graphic designers we have spoken to can’t use 640 x 480 images.

The only formats that Cutcaster can currently encode are: 3GPP, 3GPP2, AAC, AVI, BMP, DV, Flash Video, Flash, GIF, JPEG, MP3, MPEG, MPEG-4, PNG, QuickTime, TIFF, WAV and Windows Media formats.

If you want your content to have a Cutcaster watermark to protect it, which we recommend, the following source formats can have a watermark overlaid to them:
BMP
JPG
PNG

The following source formats can be read by the Cutcaster thumbnail encoding server, and we can still license them to others however a watermark can not be applied:
TIFF
GIF

We do not support thumbnail generation or re-encoding to alternative sized images for the following source formats:
PSD
EPS
TXT
3GPP
3G2
MP4
MP3
MOV (H.264 Codec)
AAC

Video Watermarking Support
The following video source formats can have a watermark applied:
AVI
MPEG
MPEG-2
MPEG-4
MOV
WMV

Watermarking can be applied to the following output formats:
3GPP
3G2
AVI
MPEG
MPEG-2
MPEG-4
MOV
WMV
FLV

We are sorry but at this time, Cutcaster does not support watermarking or transcoding for the following source formats:
FLV
SWF
3GPP
3G2

We wil continually update this list as we build out our capabilities. Let us know if there is anything that we should focus all our attention on or move to the front of the line.
Thanks

Share
© 2012 Design and Photography Highlights Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha